i'm not sure what possessed me when i thought including an image per week was a good idea--at least not when i was the one taking the photo. i am no photographer, far from it. i just point and shoot and mostly delete (love the power of digital photographs). so aside from the one week i missed, i have been laboring over images i've taken in the past to find ones that were semi-decent. and low and behold, as i rush to get one up before the week is out and i miss yet another week, i review my rule and realize it says nothing about the image being my own. which technically means i'm free and clear because i already have two up this week. but i'm certain, if i look back through my posts (some time in January or February) i'll find the one that talks about my new rule and that the images must be by none other than me to count. i suppose this means i should update the rule so i can't use its lack of clarity as an excuse later on.
normally, i embed my images as small as they go. but today, i decided to keep it a bit bigger so as to see if you see what i see. (i almost feel like i'm in the eye doctor's office and they're asking me what number i see.)
a bit of background...someone mentioned that the moon tonight was extra special, not because it is a full moon, but apparently it is a super moon...the biggest it has been in 20 years. now if i was a photographer, i might be able to capture this lovely moon in all of its glory so that it looks like a moon instead of tiny ball of light in the midst of blackness. the only have way decent picture i got was probably because the view was obstructed, which probably altered the camera focus or whatnot (i mentioned i am far from being a photographer). in the end, it looked a bit spooky and kind of cool.
|
Super Moonlit Branches
(image by rmp, that's me) |
I have the same picture but laminated on a wood canvus. Can you please estimate it's worth for me. Or tell me how to upload a picture of it
ReplyDelete